ý

Skip to the main content.
Featured Image
BLOG. 3 min read

Why You Should Separate Your Custodian and Fund Administrator

In the world of asset management, the operational structure you choose can significantly influence your governance, transparency and risk management. While bundled custody and fund administration services may appear efficient, this perceived convenience often carries hidden drawbacks. Separating these essential functions can provide asset managers with meaningful advantages in oversight, independence and adaptability.

Reduce Risk by creating Service Level Independence

A bundled custodial services model offers simplicity—one provider, one contract, one relationship. However, this surface-level convenience often comes at the expense of proper checks and balances. When custody and fund administration roles overlap, conflicts of interest may arise. Combining custody and oversight can result in reduced objectivity, affecting the accuracy of reconciliations, NAV calculations and reporting. Transparency may also suffer, as the same organization responsible for safeguarding assets is also tasked with their independent validation, increasing the likelihood of oversights remaining unchallenged.

Rigidity is another risk. Bundled platforms, designed to meet the needs of a broad client base, can be slow to adapt to your evolving strategy. Customization requests may be deprioritized or face obstacles due to internal processes, making it challenging to respond to specific requirements or rapidly changing regulations.

Large managers will need a multi-custodian model because of other factors, including geographies or assets managed, and risk diversification. An administrator can be the service provider through which they centralize their data and operational control and reduce counterparty risk by opting for a multi-custodian model.

Avoid Conflicts That Can Compromise Oversight

When the same entity provides both fund administration and custody, true independence is compromised. This arrangement creates an inherent “fox guarding the henhouse” scenario, which can impede effective risk management. Fund administrators should provide critical oversight, including error detection, escalation protocols, and audit readiness. Without independent checks, errors may persist or remain undetected, particularly under complex or highly regulated structures.

Such conflicts of interest make transparent and accountable reporting more difficult, potentially exposing asset managers to greater operational and reputational risks. In today’s environment, characterized by a stringent regulatory focus, these risks are neither theoretical nor rare.

Gain Operational Flexibility and Efficiency

There is a common misconception that a bundled custodial service model improves efficiency. In reality, independent fund administrators can deliver superior responsiveness, transparency and specialized support, unencumbered by internal priorities or conflicts. By focusing exclusively on fund administration, these providers invest in the technology, expertise and operational processes needed to respond quickly and accurately to client needs.

Asset managers who choose to unbundle can benefit from improved turnaround times, greater adaptability and higher levels of service. Changes and customizations are addressed without the friction that can arise when resources are split between competing functions.

The ý Difference: Independent, Purpose-Built Fund Administration

ý Technologies demonstrates the value of independent fund administration. By intentionally separating fund administration from custodial services, ý removes internal conflicts and delivers comprehensive support across accounting, regulatory compliance, distribution and transfer agency functions. The firm’s single-platform approach allows efficient NAV processing, shareholder servicing and regulatory filings, while maintaining complete independence from any custodian relationship.

Crucially, ý structures its solutions to align with each client’s strategy, scale and operational goals, leveraging deep industry knowledge and experience with registered funds. This focus ensures that asset managers benefit from tailored services designed to keep pace with evolving market and regulatory demands.

Transparency, Oversight and Strategic Flexibility

Unbundling custody and fund administration gives asset managers meaningful advantages. With independent oversight, the integrity of core data and controls is strengthened, supporting robust checks and balances within fund operations. Cost transparency improves, allowing clear evaluation and accountability of each provider relationship.

Perhaps most importantly, this model provides strategic flexibility. As needs and strategies evolve, asset managers can adapt their choice of providers without wholesale operational disruption. The ability to renegotiate or switch providers—without upending the entire operational infrastructure—supports resilience in a competitive and rapidly changing environment.

Conclusion: Independence Drives Better Outcomes

While a bundled custodial service model may appear to streamline operations, it often introduces governance challenges and restricts adaptability. Unbundling these services empowers asset managers to achieve greater independence, stronger oversight and strategic flexibility, ultimately supporting long-term growth and risk mitigation.

Explore our Registered Fund Services to learn how ý can serve as your independent partner.

Related articles

You’ve Segmented Your Advisors – Now What?
BLOGS. September 18, 2023

You’ve Segmented Your Advisors – Now What?

Read more
How eConsent Adoption Can Help Reduce Your Compliance Costs
BLOGS. January 30, 2024

How eConsent Adoption Can Help Reduce Your Compliance Costs

Read more
You Don’t Have to Be Wrapper-Agnostic to Win over Advisors
BLOGS. October 31, 2025

You Don’t Have to Be Wrapper-Agnostic to Win over Advisors

Read more